Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGNAX vs RPFCX
CGNAX vs RPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGNAX vs RPFCX
CGNAX vs RPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGNAX vs. RPFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGNAX is a Hold and RPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGNAX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. RPFCX (335M). CGNAX pays higher dividends than RPFCX: CGNAX (1.60) vs RPFCX (1.40). CGNAX was incepted earlier than RPFCX: CGNAX (14 years) vs RPFCX (34 years). RPFCX (0.98) is less costly to investors than CGNAX (0.68). RPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. CGNAX (2.00). RPFCX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGNAX (4%) vs CGNAX (4%). CGNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFCX: CGNAX (250) vs RPFCX (1000). RPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.44 vs. CGNAX (7.30). RPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.10 vs. CGNAX (29.79).
| CGNAX | RPFCX | CGNAX / RPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.98 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.98 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.879 | 13.633 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 335M | 7,104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.40 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 15.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.52 | 53.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.79 | 49.10 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.89 | 149.61 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers