Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGNAX vs TMAAX
CGNAX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts CGNAX vs TMAAX
CGNAX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGNAX vs. TMAAX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGNAX is a Hold and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGNAX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. TMAAX (5.81B). CGNAX pays higher dividends than TMAAX: CGNAX (1.48) vs TMAAX (1.12). CGNAX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: CGNAX (14 years) vs TMAAX (21 years). TMAAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CGNAX (0.68). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CGNAX (2.00). TMAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGNAX (4%) vs CGNAX (4%). CGNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: CGNAX (250) vs TMAAX (2000). CGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.67 vs. TMAAX (14.97). CGNAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.60 vs. TMAAX (21.59).
| CGNAX | TMAAX | CGNAX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.13 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.36 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.114 | 8.862 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 78% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 5.81B | 408% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.12 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.67 | 14.97 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.92 | 30.61 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.60 | 21.59 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.97 | 74.51 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers