Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs FAMRX
CGPAX vs FAMRX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs FAMRX
CGPAX vs FAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. FAMRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and FAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. FAMRX (7.16B). FAMRX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: FAMRX (1.29) vs CGPAX (0.30). CGPAX was incepted earlier than FAMRX: CGPAX (14 years) vs FAMRX (27 years). CGPAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FAMRX (0.66). FAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CGPAX (1.00). FAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGPAX: FAMRX (0) vs CGPAX (250). FAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.51 vs. CGPAX (7.64). FAMRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. CGPAX (20.25).
| CGPAX | FAMRX | CGPAX / FAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.63 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.149 | 14.040 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 7.16B | 392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.29 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 14.51 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.32 | 56.72 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.25 | 37.69 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.45 | 130.40 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement