Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs FAMRX
CGPAX vs FAMRX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs FAMRX
CGPAX vs FAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. FAMRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and FAMRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. FAMRX (6.99B). FAMRX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: FAMRX (1.32) vs CGPAX (0.30). CGPAX was incepted earlier than FAMRX: CGPAX (14 years) vs FAMRX (27 years). CGPAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FAMRX (0.66). FAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CGPAX (1.00). FAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGPAX: FAMRX (0) vs CGPAX (250). FAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. CGPAX (13.89). FAMRX return over 5 years is better than : 41.29 vs. CGPAX (25.19).
| CGPAX | FAMRX | CGPAX / FAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.63 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.396 | 14.932 | 76% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 6.99B | 392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.32 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.89 | 19.30 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.70 | 60.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.19 | 41.29 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.48 | 127.03 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers