Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs GWPAX
CGPAX vs GWPAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs GWPAX
CGPAX vs GWPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. GWPAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and GWPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX (26.5B) and GWPAX (26.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GWPAX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: GWPAX (0.33) vs CGPAX (0.30). CGPAX was incepted earlier than GWPAX: CGPAX (14 years) vs GWPAX (14 years). CGPAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GWPAX (0.71). CGPAX (1.00) and GWPAX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. GWPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGPAX (4%) vs CGPAX (4%). CGPAX (250) and GWPAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GWPAX (22.21) and CGPAX (22.11) have marching annual gain over last year. CGPAX (30.54) and GWPAX (30.47) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGPAX | GWPAX | CGPAX / GWPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.71 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.71 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.257 | 11.295 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 26.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.33 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.11 | 22.21 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.68 | 63.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.54 | 30.47 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.89 | 119.67 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers