Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPAX vs RGWFX
CGPAX vs RGWFX Comparison
Open Charts CGPAX vs RGWFX
CGPAX vs RGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPAX vs. RGWFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPAX is a Hold and RGWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPAX (28.2B) and RGWFX (28.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGWFX pays higher dividends than CGPAX: RGWFX (0.54) vs CGPAX (0.30). CGPAX was incepted earlier than RGWFX: CGPAX (14 years) vs RGWFX (14 years). CGPAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RGWFX (0.43). CGPAX (1.00) and RGWFX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGPAX (250) and RGWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGWFX (13.00) and CGPAX (12.58) have marching annual gain over last year. RGWFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.43 vs. CGPAX (23.81).
| CGPAX | RGWFX | CGPAX / RGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.43 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.43 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.110 | 9.271 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.2B | 28.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.54 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.58 | 13.00 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.81 | 52.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.81 | 25.43 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.23 | 116.00 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers