Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs EAEAX
CGPFX vs EAEAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs EAEAX
CGPFX vs EAEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. EAEAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and EAEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. EAEAX (923M). CGPFX pays higher dividends than EAEAX: CGPFX (0.46) vs EAEAX (0.38). CGPFX was incepted earlier than EAEAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs EAEAX (24 years). EAEAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). EAEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAEAX: CGPFX (250) vs EAEAX (1000). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. EAEAX (17.51). EAEAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.33 vs. CGPFX (32.09).
| CGPFX | EAEAX | CGPFX / EAEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.20 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.73 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.368 | 9.242 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 923M | 2,871% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.38 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 17.51 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.82 | 53.05 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | 45.33 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.23 | 158.51 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement