Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs FAMRX
CGPFX vs FAMRX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs FAMRX
CGPFX vs FAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. FAMRX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and FAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. FAMRX (6.91B). FAMRX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: FAMRX (1.31) vs CGPFX (0.46). CGPFX was incepted earlier than FAMRX: CGPFX (14 years) vs FAMRX (27 years). CGPFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FAMRX (0.66). FAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). FAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGPFX: FAMRX (0) vs CGPFX (250). FAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.65 vs. CGPFX (22.43). FAMRX return over 5 years is better than : 43.02 vs. CGPFX (32.09).
| CGPFX | FAMRX | CGPFX / FAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.63 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.66 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.368 | 13.479 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 6.91B | 384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.31 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 25.65 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.82 | 58.36 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | 43.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.23 | 134.01 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers