Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs FLCGX
CGPFX vs FLCGX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs FLCGX
CGPFX vs FLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. FLCGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and FLCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. FLCGX (45.6M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: FLCGX (0.55) vs CGPFX (0.46). CGPFX was incepted earlier than FLCGX: CGPFX (14 years) vs FLCGX (41 years). FLCGX (1.74) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: CGPFX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. FLCGX (16.13). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.09 vs. FLCGX (-5.57).
| CGPFX | FLCGX | CGPFX / FLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.74 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.74 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.368 | 8.966 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 45.6M | 58,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.55 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 16.13 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.82 | 28.20 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | -5.57 | -576% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.23 | 45.26 | 294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers