Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs FLCGX
CGPFX vs FLCGX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs FLCGX
CGPFX vs FLCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. FLCGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and FLCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. FLCGX (45.2M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: FLCGX (0.55) vs CGPFX (0.46). CGPFX was incepted earlier than FLCGX: CGPFX (14 years) vs FLCGX (41 years). FLCGX (1.74) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: CGPFX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.97 vs. FLCGX (14.86). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.72 vs. FLCGX (-2.51).
| CGPFX | FLCGX | CGPFX / FLCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.74 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.74 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.161 | 7.958 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 45.2M | 62,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.55 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.97 | 14.86 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.82 | 24.64 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.72 | -2.51 | -1,145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.38 | 49.12 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement