Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs FLDGX
CGPFX vs FLDGX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs FLDGX
CGPFX vs FLDGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. FLDGX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and FLDGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. FLDGX (589M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: FLDGX (0.89) vs CGPFX (0.46). CGPFX was incepted earlier than FLDGX: CGPFX (14 years) vs FLDGX (26 years). FLDGX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). FLDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: CGPFX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.97 vs. FLDGX (19.16). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.72 vs. FLDGX (15.01).
| CGPFX | FLDGX | CGPFX / FLDGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.46 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.46 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.161 | 11.886 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 589M | 4,771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.89 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.97 | 19.16 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.82 | 36.27 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.72 | 15.01 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.38 | 95.94 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement