Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs GWPAX
CGPFX vs GWPAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs GWPAX
CGPFX vs GWPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. GWPAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and GWPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX (26.5B) and GWPAX (26.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CGPFX pays higher dividends than GWPAX: CGPFX (0.46) vs GWPAX (0.33). CGPFX was incepted earlier than GWPAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs GWPAX (14 years). CGPFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than GWPAX (0.71). CGPFX (1.00) and GWPAX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGPFX (250) and GWPAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGPFX (22.43) and GWPAX (22.21) have marching annual gain over last year. CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.09 vs. GWPAX (30.47).
| CGPFX | GWPAX | CGPFX / GWPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.71 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.71 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.368 | 11.295 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 26.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.33 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 22.21 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.82 | 63.01 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | 30.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.23 | 119.67 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers