Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs MWFVX
CGPFX vs MWFVX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs MWFVX
CGPFX vs MWFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. MWFVX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and MWFVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. MWFVX (164M). MWFVX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: MWFVX (0.87) vs CGPFX (0.46). CGPFX was incepted earlier than MWFVX: CGPFX (14 years) vs MWFVX (6 years). MWFVX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). MWFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). MWFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGPFX: MWFVX (0) vs CGPFX (250). MWFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.24 vs. CGPFX (21.84). MWFVX return over 5 years is better than : 49.25 vs. CGPFX (30.84).
| CGPFX | MWFVX | CGPFX / MWFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.08 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.08 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.368 | 12.507 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 164M | 16,159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.87 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.84 | 26.24 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.82 | 61.71 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.84 | 49.25 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers