Ad is loading...
CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs QNTAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$23.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.74B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$32.18
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.28M
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. QNTAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. QNTAX (33.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: QNTAX (1.20) vs CGPFX (0.64). CGPFX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs QNTAX (8 years). QNTAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: CGPFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.33 vs. QNTAX (-12.83). CGPFX (39.33) and QNTAX (38.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGPFX | QNTAX | CGPFX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.53 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.53 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.191 | -7.604 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.7B | 33.3M | 56,156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.33 | -12.83 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.73 | -11.16 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.33 | 38.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...