Ad is loading...
CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs QNTAX
American Funds Growth Portfolio 529F1
Price$25.94
Change+$0.83 (+3.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.4B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$35.40
Change+$0.91 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.33M
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. QNTAX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 20.4B vs. QNTAX (35.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: QNTAX (1.19) vs CGPFX (0.63). CGPFX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: CGPFX (13 years) vs QNTAX (9 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.80). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: CGPFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. QNTAX (-10.02). QNTAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.91 vs. CGPFX (49.92).
| CGPFX | QNTAX | CGPFX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.55 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.55 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.375 | -0.631 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.4B | 35.3M | 57,790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.19 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | -10.02 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.41 | 3.49 | 727% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.92 | 52.91 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...