Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. QNTAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. QNTAX (45.2M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: QNTAX (0.67) vs CGPFX (0.46). CGPFX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs QNTAX (10 years). QNTAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). QNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: CGPFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.97 vs. QNTAX (15.11). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.72 vs. QNTAX (-1.12).
| CGPFX | QNTAX | CGPFX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.60 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.60 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.161 | 8.001 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 45.2M | 62,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.67 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.97 | 15.11 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.82 | 25.64 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.72 | -1.12 | -2,561% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement