Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts CGPFX vs QNTAX
CGPFX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGPFX vs. QNTAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGPFX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGPFX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. QNTAX (45.6M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than CGPFX: QNTAX (0.67) vs CGPFX (0.46). CGPFX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: CGPFX (14 years) vs QNTAX (10 years). QNTAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than CGPFX (0.79). QNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. CGPFX (1.00). CGPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: CGPFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). CGPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. QNTAX (16.40). CGPFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.09 vs. QNTAX (-4.20).
| CGPFX | QNTAX | CGPFX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.60 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.60 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.368 | 9.023 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 45.6M | 58,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.67 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 16.40 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.82 | 29.26 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | -4.20 | -764% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers