Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRCX vs RMEBX
CGRCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRCX vs RMEBX
CGRCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRCX (846M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CGRCX: RMEBX (0.99) vs CGRCX (0.62). CGRCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRCX (30 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CGRCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRCX: RMEBX (250) vs CGRCX (1000). CGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.97 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. CGRCX (6.16).
| CGRCX | RMEBX | CGRCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.07 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.07 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.242 | 8.448 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 846M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.97 | 4.65 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.49 | 34.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.16 | 34.68 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.19 | 92.45 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers