Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRCX vs RMEBX
CGRCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRCX vs RMEBX
CGRCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRCX (829M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CGRCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs CGRCX (0.63). CGRCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRCX (30 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CGRCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRCX: RMEBX (250) vs CGRCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. CGRCX (6.91). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. CGRCX (1.22).
| CGRCX | RMEBX | CGRCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.07 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.07 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.439 | 6.444 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 829M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 10.14 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.58 | 34.54 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.22 | 35.62 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.91 | 94.57 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement