Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRCX vs RMFCX
CGRCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRCX vs RMFCX
CGRCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRCX (847M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CGRCX: RMFCX (1.15) vs CGRCX (0.63). CGRCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRCX (30 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CGRCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRCX: RMFCX (250) vs CGRCX (1000). CGRCX (9.10) and RMFCX (9.09) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. CGRCX (4.05).
| CGRCX | RMFCX | CGRCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.207 | 9.496 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 847M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.15 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.10 | 9.09 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.21 | 33.16 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 37.08 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.38 | 92.36 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers