Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRCX vs RMFCX
CGRCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRCX vs RMFCX
CGRCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRCX (837M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CGRCX: RMFCX (1.16) vs CGRCX (0.65). CGRCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRCX (30 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CGRCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRCX: RMFCX (250) vs CGRCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. CGRCX (4.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. CGRCX (2.90).
| CGRCX | RMFCX | CGRCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.91 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.517 | 9.137 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.16 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.01 | 8.88 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.85 | 34.84 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.90 | 37.23 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.67 | 91.06 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement