Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRCX vs RMFEX
CGRCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CGRCX vs RMFEX
CGRCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRCX (837M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CGRCX: RMFEX (1.42) vs CGRCX (0.65). CGRCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CGRCX (30 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CGRCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRCX: RMFEX (250) vs CGRCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. CGRCX (4.01). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. CGRCX (2.90).
| CGRCX | RMFEX | CGRCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.62 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.62 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.517 | 9.303 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.01 | 9.23 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.85 | 36.13 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.90 | 39.39 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.67 | 99.14 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement