Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs FFFMX
CGRNX vs FFFMX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs FFFMX
CGRNX vs FFFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. FFFMX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and FFFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRNX (845M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: FFFMX (1.66) vs CGRNX (1.05). CGRNX was incepted earlier than FFFMX: CGRNX (26 years) vs FFFMX (6 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: CGRNX (0) vs FFFMX (250). CGRNX (4.52) and FFFMX (4.34) have marching annual gain over last year. FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.85 vs. CGRNX (10.25).
| CGRNX | FFFMX | CGRNX / FFFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.32 | 369% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.32 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.828 | 7.876 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 4.34 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.29 | 36.45 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.25 | 38.85 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement