Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs FFFMX
CGRNX vs FFFMX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs FFFMX
CGRNX vs FFFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CGRNX (833M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: FFFMX (1.70) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than FFFMX: CGRNX (25 years) vs FFFMX (6 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: CGRNX (0) vs FFFMX (250). FFFMX (10.83) and CGRNX (10.46) have marching annual gain over last year. FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.08 vs. CGRNX (1.42).
| CGRNX | FFFMX | CGRNX / FFFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.32 | 369% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.32 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.454 | 6.123 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 10.83 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.24 | 37.21 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.42 | 38.08 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers