Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs FFMMX
CGRNX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs FFMMX
CGRNX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRNX (845M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: FFMMX (1.67) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: CGRNX (25 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: CGRNX (0) vs FFMMX (250). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. CGRNX (10.58). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 43.23 vs. CGRNX (10.65).
| CGRNX | FFMMX | CGRNX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.36 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.36 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.621 | 7.587 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | 11.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.67 | 36.27 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.65 | 43.23 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers