Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs FFMMX
CGRNX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs FFMMX
CGRNX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. FFMMX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and FFMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRNX (849M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: FFMMX (1.63) vs CGRNX (1.05). CGRNX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: CGRNX (26 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: CGRNX (0) vs FFMMX (250). CGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. FFMMX (5.30). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.69 vs. CGRNX (10.70).
| CGRNX | FFMMX | CGRNX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.36 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.36 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.093 | 8.638 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 849M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.63 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 5.30 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.37 | 37.12 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.70 | 38.69 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers