Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs FFMMX
CGRNX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs FFMMX
CGRNX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. FFMMX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and FFMMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRNX (867M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: FFMMX (1.64) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: CGRNX (26 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: CGRNX (0) vs FFMMX (250). FFMMX (9.17) and CGRNX (8.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.21 vs. CGRNX (10.33).
| CGRNX | FFMMX | CGRNX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.36 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.36 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.943 | 10.943 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 867M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.64 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 9.17 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.71 | 40.86 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.33 | 40.21 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement