Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMEBX
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMEBX
Invesco Comstock Select R
Price$31.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets749.83M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.30
Change+$0.33 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.64B
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. CGRNX (750M). CGRNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CGRNX (1.38) vs RMEBX (1.16). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRNX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). CGRNX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CGRNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. CGRNX (-4.89). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.96 vs. CGRNX (50.18).
| CGRNX | RMEBX | CGRNX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.070 | 6.766 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 750M | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.89 | 9.32 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.73 | 27.70 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 59.96 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.47 | 70.29 | 11% |