Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMEBX
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMEBX
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CGRNX (833M). CGRNX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRNX (25 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CGRNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). CGRNX (10.46) and RMEBX (9.98) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. CGRNX (1.42).
| CGRNX | RMEBX | CGRNX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.454 | 5.801 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 9.98 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.24 | 34.14 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.42 | 32.93 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.54 | 89.84 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement