Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMEBX
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMEBX
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRNX (867M). CGRNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CGRNX (1.07) vs RMEBX (0.99). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRNX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CGRNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). CGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. RMEBX (8.38). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.23 vs. CGRNX (10.33).
| CGRNX | RMEBX | CGRNX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.943 | 10.434 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 867M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.99 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 8.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.71 | 37.82 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.33 | 35.23 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.56 | 92.37 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement