Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMEBX
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMEBX
CGRNX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRNX (845M). CGRNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CGRNX (1.05) vs RMEBX (0.99). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRNX (26 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: CGRNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). CGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. RMEBX (3.55). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.68 vs. CGRNX (10.25).
| CGRNX | RMEBX | CGRNX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.828 | 7.309 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.99 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 3.55 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.29 | 33.39 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.25 | 33.68 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.21 | 89.90 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement