Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CGRNX (833M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: RMFCX (1.19) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). CGRNX (10.46) and RMFCX (10.10) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. CGRNX (1.42).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.454 | 5.845 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 10.10 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.24 | 34.65 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.42 | 33.85 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.54 | 91.46 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers