Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRNX (830M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: RMFCX (1.19) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. CGRNX (6.16). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.72 vs. CGRNX (5.42).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.323 | 7.804 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 830M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 9.60 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.30 | 35.52 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.42 | 36.72 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.56 | 98.68 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement