Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRNX (844M). RMFCX (1.16) and CGRNX (1.11) have matching dividends . CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. CGRNX (6.39). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. CGRNX (9.97).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.049 | 9.325 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 844M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.16 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 7.69 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.49 | 32.42 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.97 | 37.08 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.18 | 91.03 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement