Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFCX
CGRNX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRNX (867M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: RMFCX (1.15) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRNX (26 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFCX (250). CGRNX (8.88) and RMFCX (8.49) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.14 vs. CGRNX (10.33).
| CGRNX | RMFCX | CGRNX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.91 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.943 | 10.522 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 867M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 8.49 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.71 | 38.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.33 | 36.14 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.56 | 94.06 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement