Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFEX
CGRNX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFEX
CGRNX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. CGRNX (833M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: RMFEX (1.45) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CGRNX (25 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX (10.46) and CGRNX (10.46) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. CGRNX (1.42).
| CGRNX | RMFEX | CGRNX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.62 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.62 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.454 | 5.987 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.45 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 10.46 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.24 | 35.96 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.42 | 35.97 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.54 | 99.50 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement