Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFEX
CGRNX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFEX
CGRNX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRNX (867M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: RMFEX (1.41) vs CGRNX (1.07). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CGRNX (26 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFEX (250). CGRNX (8.88) and RMFEX (8.87) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.32 vs. CGRNX (10.33).
| CGRNX | RMFEX | CGRNX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.62 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.62 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.943 | 10.749 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 867M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.41 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 8.87 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.71 | 39.72 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.33 | 38.32 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.56 | 102.32 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement