Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRNX vs RMFEX
CGRNX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CGRNX vs RMFEX
CGRNX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRNX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRNX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRNX (845M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CGRNX: RMFEX (1.41) vs CGRNX (1.05). CGRNX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CGRNX (26 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CGRNX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CGRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). CGRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: CGRNX (0) vs RMFEX (250). CGRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. RMFEX (4.01). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.73 vs. CGRNX (10.25).
| CGRNX | RMFEX | CGRNX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.62 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.62 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.828 | 7.641 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 4.01 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.29 | 35.19 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.25 | 36.73 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.21 | 100.00 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement