Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRWX vs RMEBX
CGRWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRWX vs RMEBX
Invesco Comstock Select A
Price$32.87
Change+$0.15 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets756.29M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
CGRWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRWX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. CGRWX (756M). CGRWX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CGRWX (1.63) vs RMEBX (1.16). CGRWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRWX (40 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CGRWX (0.93). CGRWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRWX: RMEBX (250) vs CGRWX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. CGRWX (-3.10). CGRWX (63.25) and RMEBX (62.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CGRWX | RMEBX | CGRWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.07 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.893 | 7.315 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.16 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | 9.50 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.07 | 25.88 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.25 | 62.71 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.09 | 74.51 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement