Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRWX vs RMEBX
CGRWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGRWX vs RMEBX
CGRWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRWX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRWX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CGRWX (846M). CGRWX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CGRWX (1.27) vs RMEBX (0.99). CGRWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CGRWX (41 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CGRWX (0.92). CGRWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRWX: RMEBX (250) vs CGRWX (1000). CGRWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. CGRWX (15.08).
| CGRWX | RMEBX | CGRWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.849 | 8.448 | 140% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 846M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.99 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | 4.65 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.31 | 34.88 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.08 | 34.68 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.23 | 92.45 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers