Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRWX vs RMFCX
CGRWX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRWX vs RMFCX
CGRWX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRWX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRWX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRWX (837M). CGRWX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CGRWX (1.34) vs RMFCX (1.16). CGRWX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRWX (41 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CGRWX (0.92) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CGRWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRWX: RMFCX (250) vs CGRWX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. CGRWX (6.08). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. CGRWX (11.52).
| CGRWX | RMFCX | CGRWX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.91 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.964 | 9.137 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.16 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 8.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.45 | 34.84 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.52 | 37.23 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.14 | 91.06 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers