Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGRYX vs RMFCX
CGRYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CGRYX vs RMFCX
CGRYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGRYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGRYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CGRYX (837M). CGRYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CGRYX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.16). CGRYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CGRYX (30 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CGRYX (0.68). CGRYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGRYX: RMFCX (250) vs CGRYX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. CGRYX (6.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. CGRYX (14.94).
| CGRYX | RMFCX | CGRYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.91 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.91 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.085 | 9.137 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.16 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 8.88 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.67 | 34.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 37.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.92 | 91.06 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement