Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGTAX vs RGVBX
CGTAX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts CGTAX vs RGVBX
CGTAX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGTAX vs. RGVBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGTAX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGTAX (24.3B) and RGVBX (24.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CGTAX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: CGTAX (4.00) vs RGVBX (3.31). CGTAX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: CGTAX (24 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CGTAX (0.65). CGTAX (50.00) and RGVBX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGTAX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.11 vs. RGVBX (1.40). CGTAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.75 vs. RGVBX (-5.98).
| CGTAX | RGVBX | CGTAX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.32 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.32 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.609 | -1.974 | 82% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 24.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 3.31 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.11 | 1.40 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.67 | 7.38 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.75 | -5.98 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.32 | -2.63 | -164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement