Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGTRX vs RGABX
CGTRX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts CGTRX vs RGABX
CGTRX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGTRX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGTRX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CGTRX (534M). CGTRX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGTRX was incepted earlier than RGABX: CGTRX (14 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CGTRX (0.83). CGTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). CGTRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: CGTRX (0) vs RGABX (250). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. CGTRX (6.44). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. CGTRX (-36.82).
| CGTRX | RGABX | CGTRX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.38 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.028 | 8.319 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 534M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 9.83 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.36 | 41.24 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.82 | 10.82 | -340% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.15 | 97.06 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement