Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGVFX vs RWIFX
CGVFX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts CGVFX vs RWIFX
CGVFX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGVFX vs. RWIFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGVFX is a Hold and RWIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. CGVFX (21.5B). RWIFX pays higher dividends than CGVFX: RWIFX (1.57) vs CGVFX (0.93). CGVFX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: CGVFX (7 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). CGVFX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). RWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CGVFX (35.00). CGVFX (250) and RWIFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.48 vs. RWIFX (22.26). CGVFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.36 vs. RWIFX (37.12).
| CGVFX | RWIFX | CGVFX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.46 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.46 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.536 | 15.808 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 160B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.57 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.48 | 22.26 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.90 | 54.76 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.36 | 37.12 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement