Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGVHX vs CWGFX
CGVHX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts CGVHX vs CWGFX
CGVHX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGVHX vs. CWGFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGVHX is a Buy and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CGVHX (21.7B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than CGVHX: CWGFX (1.29) vs CGVHX (1.03). CGVHX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: CGVHX (6 years) vs CWGFX (26 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than CGVHX (0.50). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CGVHX (35.00). CGVHX (250) and CWGFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGVHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. CWGFX (11.47). CGVHX return over 5 years is better than : 53.37 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CGVHX | CWGFX | CGVHX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.79 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.149 | 15.977 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 158B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.29 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.37 | 11.47 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.58 | 51.55 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.37 | 32.66 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement