Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGVHX vs RWIBX
CGVHX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts CGVHX vs RWIBX
CGVHX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. CGVHX (20.6B). CGVHX pays higher dividends than RWIBX: CGVHX (1.04) vs RWIBX (0.74). CGVHX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: CGVHX (6 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CGVHX (0.50). RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CGVHX (35.00). CGVHX (250) and RWIBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGVHX (22.39) and RWIBX (21.41) have marching annual gain over last year. CGVHX return over 5 years is better than : 55.81 vs. RWIBX (31.20).
| CGVHX | RWIBX | CGVHX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.51 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.51 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.618 | 15.289 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 152B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.74 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.39 | 21.41 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | 50.98 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.81 | 31.20 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement