Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGVHX vs RWIBX
CGVHX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts CGVHX vs RWIBX
CGVHX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGVHX vs. RWIBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGVHX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CGVHX (21.7B). CGVHX pays higher dividends than RWIBX: CGVHX (1.03) vs RWIBX (0.70). CGVHX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: CGVHX (6 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CGVHX (0.50). RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CGVHX (35.00). CGVHX (250) and RWIBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGVHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. RWIBX (10.55). CGVHX return over 5 years is better than : 53.37 vs. RWIBX (28.63).
| CGVHX | RWIBX | CGVHX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.51 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.51 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.149 | 15.403 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 158B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.70 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.37 | 10.55 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.58 | 48.09 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.37 | 28.63 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers