Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGVHX vs RWIFX
CGVHX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts CGVHX vs RWIFX
CGVHX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGVHX vs. RWIFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGVHX is a Buy and RWIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CGVHX (21.7B). RWIFX pays higher dividends than CGVHX: RWIFX (1.57) vs CGVHX (1.03). CGVHX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: CGVHX (6 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). CGVHX (0.50) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). RWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CGVHX (35.00). CGVHX (250) and RWIFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CGVHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.37 vs. RWIFX (11.87). CGVHX return over 5 years is better than : 53.37 vs. RWIFX (34.54).
| CGVHX | RWIFX | CGVHX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.46 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.46 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.149 | 16.246 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 158B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.57 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.37 | 11.87 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.58 | 53.16 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.37 | 34.54 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement