| CGW | CUT | CGW / CUT | |
| Gain YTD | 3.109 | 2.548 | 122% |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 33M | 3,182% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.76 | 76% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 26.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 1.54 | 2.40 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| CGW | CUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGW has been loosely correlated with WMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGW jumps, then WMS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and CLW have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and CLW's prices will move in lockstep.