Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGWRX vs GFACX
CGWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CGWRX vs GFACX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth R
Price$77.41
Change+$0.24 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
CGWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGWRX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CGWRX (6.4B). CGWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CGWRX (15 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CGWRX (1.23). CGWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). CGWRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CGWRX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. CGWRX (14.46). CGWRX return over 5 years is better than : 53.26 vs. GFACX (39.11).
| CGWRX | GFACX | CGWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.36 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.36 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.205 | 17.158 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.46 | 15.58 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.69 | 53.17 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.26 | 39.11 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.49 | 82.02 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement