Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGWRX vs GFFFX
CGWRX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CGWRX vs GFFFX
Columbia Cornerstone Growth R
Price$79.31
Change+$0.76 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$89.06
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
CGWRX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGWRX vs. GFFFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGWRX is a StrongBuy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. CGWRX (6.51B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CGWRX: GFFFX (0.50) vs CGWRX (0.00). CGWRX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CGWRX (15 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). CGWRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CGWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). CGWRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: CGWRX (0) vs GFFFX (250). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. CGWRX (13.32). CGWRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.66 vs. GFFFX (43.53).
| CGWRX | GFFFX | CGWRX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.40 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.40 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.857 | 20.076 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.51B | 341B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.32 | 15.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.96 | 76.98 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.66 | 43.53 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.98 | 107.13 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement