Ad is loading...
CGXU vs OSEA
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs OSEA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$23.75
Change-$0.99 (-4.00%)
Volume$1.26M
Net Assets3.34B
Harbor International Compounders ETF
Price$26.17
Change-$0.54 (-2.02%)
Volume$82.66K
Net Assets396.78M
CGXU vs OSEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. OSEA commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a StrongBuy and OSEA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.34B vs. OSEA (397M). OSEA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: OSEA (1.238) vs CGXU (-3.729). CGXU was incepted earlier than OSEA: CGXU (3 years) vs OSEA (3 years). CGXU (0.54) and OSEA (0.55) have comparable expense ratios . CGXU has a higher turnover OSEA (3.00) vs OSEA (3.00).
| CGXU | OSEA | CGXU / OSEA | |
| Gain YTD | -3.729 | 1.238 | -301% |
| Net Assets | 3.34B | 397M | 841% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.55 | 98% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 3.00 | 1,200% |
| Yield | 1.02 | 0.50 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -4.00% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | -7.41% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | -11.25% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| WDS - CGXU | 56% Loosely correlated | -6.33% | ||
More | ||||
OSEA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSEA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSEA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSEA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSEA | 100% | -2.02% | ||
| ASML - OSEA | 52% Loosely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| TSM - OSEA | 47% Loosely correlated | -7.64% | ||
| SAP - OSEA | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| FERG - OSEA | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.88% | ||
| OR - OSEA | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||