Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$26.93
Change+$0.50 (+1.89%)
Volume$553.12K
Net Assets3.66B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$26.11
Change+$0.45 (+1.75%)
Volume$34.19K
Net Assets131.43M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and UMMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.66B vs. UMMA (131M). UMMA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: UMMA (8.808) vs CGXU (7.134). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (3 years) vs UMMA (3 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 8.808 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 131M | 2,793% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 11.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 0.84 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| RIO - CGXU | 67% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 73% Closely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 69% Closely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| CP - UMMA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||