Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$28.14
Change-$0.19 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.31K
Net Assets3.91B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$26.21
Change-$0.42 (-1.58%)
Volume$100
Net Assets153.96M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a StrongBuy and UMMA is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.92B vs. UMMA (154M). CGXU has a higher annual dividend yield than UMMA: CGXU (16.085) vs UMMA (12.975). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (4 years) vs UMMA (4 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 16.085 | 12.975 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 3.92B | 154M | 2,542% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 11.00 | 482% |
| Yield | 1.45 | 0.84 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 77% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 70% Closely correlated | +3.20% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 67% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| NWG - CGXU | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| CRH - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
More | ||||