Ad is loading...
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$25.73
Change-$0.50 (-1.91%)
Volume$675.81K
Net Assets3.4B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$25.63
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
Volume$19.35K
Net Assets126.92M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and UMMA is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.4B vs. UMMA (127M). UMMA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: UMMA (8.418) vs CGXU (4.297). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (3 years) vs UMMA (3 years).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.297 | 8.418 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 127M | 2,675% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 11.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.79 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 83% | 21 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -1.91% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.80% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| WDS - CGXU | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 69% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| CP - UMMA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||