Ad is loading...
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$22.03
Change-$1.72 (-7.24%)
Volume$200
Net Assets3.34B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$22.11
Change-$1.48 (-6.27%)
Volume$300
Net Assets118.22M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and UMMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 3.34B vs. UMMA (118M). UMMA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGXU: UMMA (0.030) vs CGXU (-3.729). CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (3 years) vs UMMA (3 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (11.00) vs UMMA (11.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | -3.729 | 0.030 | -12,362% |
| Net Assets | 3.34B | 118M | 2,831% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 11.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 1.02 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -4.00% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 73% Closely correlated | -7.41% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 61% Loosely correlated | -11.25% | ||
| SAP - CGXU | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| WDS - CGXU | 56% Loosely correlated | -6.33% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 73% Closely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 69% Closely correlated | -7.64% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| CP - UMMA | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||