Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGXU vs UMMA
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison
Open Charts CGXU vs UMMA
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
Price$29.15
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
Volume$100
Net Assets4.29B
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
Price$27.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.22%)
Volume$100
Net Assets166.77M
CGXU vs UMMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGXU vs. UMMA commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGXU is a Hold and UMMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGXU has more net assets: 4.29B vs. UMMA (167M). CGXU (19.896) and UMMA (19.067) have matching annual dividend yield . CGXU was incepted earlier than UMMA: CGXU (4 years) vs UMMA (4 years). CGXU (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than UMMA (0.65). CGXU has a higher turnover UMMA (15.00) vs UMMA (15.00).
| CGXU | UMMA | CGXU / UMMA | |
| Gain YTD | 19.896 | 19.067 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 167M | 2,571% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.65 | 83% |
| Turnover | 53.00 | 15.00 | 353% |
| Yield | 1.27 | 1.06 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGXU | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGXU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXU has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGXU jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGXU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| BN - CGXU | 76% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| SAN - CGXU | 68% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| NXPI - CGXU | 67% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ASML - CGXU | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| MC - CGXU | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
More | ||||
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 78% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 70% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| CRH - UMMA | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SAN - UMMA | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||