Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHASX vs RGEBX
CHASX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CHASX vs RGEBX
CHASX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHASX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHASX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CHASX (131M). CHASX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CHASX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CHASX (29 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). CHASX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). CHASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHASX: RGEBX (250) vs CHASX (2000). CHASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.13 vs. RGEBX (11.84). CHASX return over 5 years is better than : 30.23 vs. RGEBX (18.07).
| CHASX | RGEBX | CHASX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.08 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.08 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.051 | 9.262 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.13 | 11.84 | 322% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.66 | 44.50 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.23 | 18.07 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.79 | 106.27 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement