Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHCCX vs FSMAX
CHCCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CHCCX vs FSMAX
CHCCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHCCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHCCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CHCCX (2.72B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CHCCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CHCCX (0.00). CHCCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CHCCX (33 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CHCCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHCCX: FSMAX (0) vs CHCCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.54 vs. CHCCX (8.59). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.01 vs. CHCCX (-35.35).
| CHCCX | FSMAX | CHCCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.04 | 4,829% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.04 | 4,857% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.957 | 18.327 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 40.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 26.54 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | 69.30 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.35 | 38.01 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.12 | 139.87 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers