Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHCGX vs GFAFX
CHCGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CHCGX vs GFAFX
CHCGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHCGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHCGX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CHCGX (46M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CHCGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs CHCGX (0.00). CHCGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CHCGX (29 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CHCGX (1.71) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). CHCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHCGX: GFAFX (250) vs CHCGX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.22 vs. CHCGX (3.45). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.06 vs. CHCGX (4.05).
| CHCGX | GFAFX | CHCGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.65 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.65 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.940 | 9.395 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.45 | 7.22 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.65 | 45.78 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 18.06 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.06 | 112.92 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement