Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHCIX vs FSMAX
CHCIX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CHCIX vs FSMAX
CHCIX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHCIX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHCIX is a Hold and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CHCIX (2.83B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CHCIX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CHCIX (0.00). CHCIX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CHCIX (21 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CHCIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHCIX: FSMAX (0) vs CHCIX (2000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.94 vs. CHCIX (17.18). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.73 vs. CHCIX (-6.18).
| CHCIX | FSMAX | CHCIX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.04 | 2,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.04 | 2,171% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.167 | 14.403 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 42.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.18 | 27.94 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.09 | 67.15 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.18 | 33.73 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.56 | 147.10 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers