Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHCLX vs FSMAX
CHCLX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CHCLX vs FSMAX
CHCLX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHCLX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHCLX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CHCLX (2.93B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CHCLX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CHCLX (0.00). CHCLX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CHCLX (88 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CHCLX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CHCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHCLX: FSMAX (0) vs CHCLX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. CHCLX (19.70). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. CHCLX (-8.45).
| CHCLX | FSMAX | CHCLX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.04 | 2,629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.04 | 2,657% |
| Fund Existence | 88 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.337 | 15.427 | 132% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 42.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.70 | 29.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.33 | 73.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.45 | 33.65 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.44 | 153.47 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers