Advertisement
CHDN vs MRDN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHDN is a Hold and MRDN is a Hold.
| CHDN | MRDN | CHDN / MRDN | |
| Capitalization | 5.62B | 182M | 3,087% |
| EBITDA | 1.12B | -72.69M | -1,535% |
| Gain YTD | -27.738 | 45.688 | -61% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.03 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.99B | 197M | 1,519% |
| Total Cash | 196M | 17.7M | 1,107% |
| Total Debt | 4.78B | 16.4M | 29,152% |
CHDN | MRDN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRDN's Valuation (53) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CHDN (56) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MRDN’s stock grew similarly to CHDN’s over the last 12 months.
MRDN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CHDN (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MRDN’s stock grew similarly to CHDN’s over the last 12 months.
CHDN's SMR Rating (30) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRDN (98) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CHDN’s stock grew significantly faster than MRDN’s over the last 12 months.
MRDN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CHDN (70) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MRDN’s stock grew similarly to CHDN’s over the last 12 months.
CHDN's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRDN (100) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CHDN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRDN’s over the last 12 months.
| CHDN | MRDN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 59% | 22 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 9 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHDN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MRDN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CHDN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRDN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHDN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRDN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHDN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MRDN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CHDN (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while MRDN (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHDN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
MRDN is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-1.48% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JEPQ | 59.95 | 0.86 | +1.46% |
| JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Inc ETF | |||
| RWX | 26.63 | 0.07 | +0.26% |
| State Street® SPDR® Dow Jones® IntlREETF | |||
| CBXJ | 21.12 | 0.03 | +0.16% |
| Calamos Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan | |||
| SECU | 48.95 | 0.06 | +0.13% |
| iShares Securitized Income Active ETF | |||
| IBIC | 25.71 | N/A | +0.01% |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term Tips ETF | |||
CHDN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDN has been loosely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDN jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHDN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHDN | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| BYD - CHDN | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MGM - CHDN | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| PENN - CHDN | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| CZR - CHDN | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HGV - CHDN | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
MRDN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRDN and ACEL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRDN and ACEL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRDN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRDN | 100% | -2.64% | ||
| ACEL - MRDN | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| RSI - MRDN | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| DKNG - MRDN | 14% Poorly correlated | -7.64% | ||
| CHDN - MRDN | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| GDC - MRDN | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.03% | ||
More | ||||