It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHDN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRDN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHDN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRDN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CHDN (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.54% price change this week, while MRDN (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -15.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.52%.
CHDN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
MRDN is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| CHDN | MRDN | CHDN / MRDN | |
| Capitalization | 5.88B | 143M | 4,109% |
| EBITDA | 1.12B | -72.69M | -1,535% |
| Gain YTD | -25.910 | 17.279 | -150% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.31 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.99B | 197M | 1,519% |
| Total Cash | 196M | 17.7M | 1,107% |
| Total Debt | 4.78B | 16.4M | 29,152% |
CHDN | MRDN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRDN's Valuation (44) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CHDN (56) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MRDN’s stock grew similarly to CHDN’s over the last 12 months.
MRDN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CHDN (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MRDN’s stock grew similarly to CHDN’s over the last 12 months.
CHDN's SMR Rating (30) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRDN (99) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CHDN’s stock grew significantly faster than MRDN’s over the last 12 months.
MRDN's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CHDN (72) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that MRDN’s stock grew similarly to CHDN’s over the last 12 months.
CHDN's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MRDN (100) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that CHDN’s stock grew similarly to MRDN’s over the last 12 months.
| CHDN | MRDN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 12 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VT | 155.86 | 0.41 | +0.26% |
| Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | |||
| XEMD | 44.45 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| BondBloxx JP Morgan USD EM 1-10 Yr BdETF | |||
| MYMF | 24.88 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| State Street® My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| PRAE | 39.40 | N/A | N/A |
| PlanRock Alternative Growth ETF | |||
| MSD | 7.24 | -0.03 | -0.41% |
| Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDN has been loosely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDN jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHDN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHDN | 100% | +1.95% | ||
| BYD - CHDN | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| MGM - CHDN | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| PENN - CHDN | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CZR - CHDN | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| HGV - CHDN | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRDN and ACEL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRDN and ACEL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRDN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRDN | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| ACEL - MRDN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| BRSL - MRDN | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
| CHDN - MRDN | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
| RSI - MRDN | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| DKNG - MRDN | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||