CHDRF
Price
$575.00
Change
+$35.55 (+6.59%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
101.2B
LKFLF
Price
$3.27
Change
+$0.77 (+30.80%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHDRF vs LKFLF

Header iconCHDRF vs LKFLF Comparison
Open Charts CHDRF vs LKFLFBanner chart's image
Christian Dior S.E
Price$575.00
Change+$35.55 (+6.59%)
Volume$16
Capitalization101.2B
Luk Fook Holdings International
Price$3.27
Change+$0.77 (+30.80%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization1.78B
CHDRF vs LKFLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHDRF vs. LKFLF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHDRF is a Buy and LKFLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CHDRF: $575.00 vs. LKFLF: $3.27)
Brand notoriety: CHDRF and LKFLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHDRF: 93% vs. LKFLF: 19%
Market capitalization -- CHDRF: $101.2B vs. LKFLF: $1.78B
CHDRF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $101.2B. LKFLF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $290.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHDRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLKFLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CHDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LKFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKFLF is a better buy in the long-term than CHDRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHDRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKFLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHDRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LKFLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHDRF is a better buy in the short-term than LKFLF.

Price Growth

CHDRF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +6.59% price change this week, while LKFLF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+2.52% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHDRF($101B) has a higher market cap than LKFLF($1.78B). CHDRF has higher P/E ratio than LKFLF: CHDRF (19.57) vs LKFLF (13.63). LKFLF YTD gains are higher at: 94.643 vs. CHDRF (-6.352).
CHDRFLKFLFCHDRF / LKFLF
Capitalization101B1.78B5,687%
EBITDA25.5BN/A-
Gain YTD-6.35294.643-7%
P/E Ratio19.5713.63144%
Revenue82.8BN/A-
Total Cash12.5BN/A-
Total Debt49.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHDRF vs LKFLF: Fundamental Ratings
CHDRF
LKFLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3237
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7360
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKFLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (18). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (73). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (100). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (61). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHDRF (100). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to CHDRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHDRFLKFLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSBKX21.87N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Global Allocation R
ECASX27.96N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
ADOIX18.88N/A
N/A
Axs Dynamic Opportunity I
TQSAX24.59N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
TQCRX19.89N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Equity R6

CHDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHDRF has been loosely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHDRF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHDRF
1D Price
Change %
CHDRF100%
+6.59%
LVMUY - CHDRF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
LVMHF - CHDRF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
HESAY - CHDRF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
SWGAY - CHDRF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
PPRUY - CHDRF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More

LKFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKFLF and CJEWY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKFLF and CJEWY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFLF
1D Price
Change %
LKFLF100%
N/A
CJEWY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHDRF - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.59%
BCUCY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
SWGAY - LKFLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
BBRYF - LKFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More