CHGG
Price
$1.27
Change
+$0.01 (+0.79%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
137.58M
23 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
RGP
Price
$4.35
Change
-$0.24 (-5.23%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
145.25M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHGG vs RGP

Header iconCHGG vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts CHGG vs RGPBanner chart's image
CHEGG
Price$1.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.79%)
Volume$3.02M
Capitalization137.58M
Resources Connection
Price$4.35
Change-$0.24 (-5.23%)
Volume$470.89K
Capitalization145.25M
CHGG vs RGP Comparison Chart in %
CHGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHGG vs. RGP commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHGG is a Hold and RGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CHGG: $1.27 vs. RGP: $4.35)
Brand notoriety: CHGG and RGP are both not notable
CHGG represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while RGP is part of the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHGG: 79% vs. RGP: 127%
Market capitalization -- CHGG: $137.58M vs. RGP: $145.25M
CHGG [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $137.58M. RGP’s [@Data Processing Services] market capitalization is $145.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.85B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $43.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHGG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHGG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CHGG and RGP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHGG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHGG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHGG is a better buy in the short-term than RGP.

Price Growth

CHGG (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while RGP (@Data Processing Services) price change was -4.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHGG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Jan 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.50% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Data Processing Services (+0.16% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGP($145M) and CHGG($138M) have the same market capitalization . CHGG has higher P/E ratio than RGP: CHGG (30.31) vs RGP (24.22). CHGG YTD gains are higher at: -21.118 vs. RGP (-46.684). RGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.98M vs. CHGG (-179.31M). CHGG has more cash in the bank: 85.6M vs. RGP (77.5M). RGP has less debt than CHGG: RGP (25.4M) vs CHGG (84.8M). RGP has higher revenues than CHGG: RGP (535M) vs CHGG (507M).
CHGGRGPCHGG / RGP
Capitalization138M145M95%
EBITDA-179.31M8.98M-1,998%
Gain YTD-21.118-46.68445%
P/E Ratio30.3124.22125%
Revenue507M535M95%
Total Cash85.6M77.5M110%
Total Debt84.8M25.4M334%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHGG vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
CHGG
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5563
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4585
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHGG (73) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than CHGG’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHGG (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to CHGG’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CHGG (99) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to CHGG’s over the last 12 months.

CHGG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (85) in the null industry. This means that CHGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

CHGG's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RGP (15) in the null industry. This means that CHGG’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHGGRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CODAF21.172.73
+14.80%
Codan Ltd
DBCCF0.10N/A
+3.05%
Decibel Cannabis Co Inc.
CLPBY9.090.05
+0.55%
Coloplast AS
RMRYF0.05N/A
-0.27%
ARMORY MNG CORP.
ADLRF12.94-0.23
-1.75%
ALARIS EQUITY PARTNERS INCOME TR

CHGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHGG and ADT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHGG and ADT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHGG
1D Price
Change %
CHGG100%
+0.79%
ADT - CHGG
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
ATAI - CHGG
29%
Poorly correlated
+17.70%
BV - CHGG
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.57%
RGP - CHGG
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.23%
DLHC - CHGG
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
-5.23%
FC - RGP
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
MSA - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
CASS - RGP
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
GHC - RGP
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
GPN - RGP
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
More