Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHGX vs RECS
CHGX vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHGX vs. RECS commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHGX is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.15B vs. CHGX (132M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than CHGX: RECS (8.348) vs CHGX (-31.310). CHGX was incepted earlier than RECS: CHGX (8 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CHGX (0.49). CHGX has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| CHGX | RECS | CHGX / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -31.310 | 8.348 | -375% |
| Net Assets | 132M | 3.15B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 49.00 | 135% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 0.65 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHGX | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 15 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JEMA | 43.95 | 0.33 | +0.76% |
| JPMorgan ActiveBuilders EM Eq ETF | |||
| XBOC | 32.06 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF™ Oct | |||
| ESMV | 28.64 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| iShares ESG Optd MSCI USA Min Vol FacETF | |||
| DBL | 15.10 | -0.03 | -0.20% |
| Doubleline Opportunistic Credit Fund | |||
| WHTX | 12.02 | -0.22 | -1.76% |
| 2x Wheat ETF | |||
CHGX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHGX has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHGX jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHGX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHGX | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| BLK - CHGX | 69% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| CDNS - CHGX | 68% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| TEL - CHGX | 67% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| KKR - CHGX | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SNPS - CHGX | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.00% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
More | ||||