Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHGX vs RECS
CHGX vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHGX vs. RECS commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHGX is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.33B vs. CHGX (133M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than CHGX: RECS (11.901) vs CHGX (-30.145). CHGX was incepted earlier than RECS: CHGX (8 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CHGX (0.49). CHGX has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| CHGX | RECS | CHGX / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -30.145 | 11.901 | -253% |
| Net Assets | 133M | 3.33B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 49.00 | 135% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 0.64 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHGX | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHGX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHGX has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHGX jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHGX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHGX | 100% | +1.14% | ||
| BLK - CHGX | 69% Closely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| KKR - CHGX | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.01% | ||
| MCHP - CHGX | 64% Loosely correlated | +5.82% | ||
| TROW - CHGX | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| CAT - CHGX | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.73% | ||
More | ||||