Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHGX vs RECS
CHGX vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts CHGX vs RECS
CHGX vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHGX vs. RECS commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHGX is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.78B vs. CHGX (170M). CHGX has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: CHGX (22.189) vs RECS (7.223). CHGX was incepted earlier than RECS: CHGX (9 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CHGX (0.49). CHGX has a higher turnover RECS (32.00) vs RECS (32.00).
| CHGX | RECS | CHGX / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 22.189 | 7.223 | 307% |
| Net Assets | 170M | 5.78B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.15 | 327% |
| Turnover | 95.00 | 32.00 | 297% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.74 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHGX | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IAUI | 52.32 | 0.25 | +0.49% |
| NEOS Gold High Income ETF | |||
| BRLN | 50.93 | 0.09 | +0.18% |
| iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF | |||
| RSDE | 23.38 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Eql Wght Buffr ETF - Dec | |||
| BUFB | 39.28 | -0.06 | -0.15% |
| Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF | |||
| EMGF | 73.86 | -1.07 | -1.42% |
| iShares Em Mkts Eq Fac ETF | |||
CHGX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHGX has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHGX jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHGX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHGX | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| BLK - CHGX | 69% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| KKR - CHGX | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| MCHP - CHGX | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.68% | ||
| TROW - CHGX | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CDNS - CHGX | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
More | ||||