CHMG
Price
$53.50
Change
+$0.17 (+0.32%)
Updated
Sep 4, 10:50 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
255.5M
54 days until earnings call
FULT
Price
$19.50
Change
+$0.05 (+0.26%)
Updated
Sep 4, 11:17 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.54B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHMG vs FULT

Header iconCHMG vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts CHMG vs FULTBanner chart's image
Chemung Financial
Price$53.50
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization255.5M
Fulton Financial
Price$19.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.54B
CHMG vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHMG vs. FULT commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHMG is a StrongBuy and FULT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CHMG: $53.33 vs. FULT: $19.45)
Brand notoriety: CHMG and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHMG: 75% vs. FULT: 64%
Market capitalization -- CHMG: $255.5M vs. FULT: $3.54B
CHMG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $255.5M. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHMG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than CHMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CHMG and FULT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CHMG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHMG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.54B) has a higher market cap than CHMG($256M). CHMG has higher P/E ratio than FULT: CHMG (22.79) vs FULT (11.44). CHMG YTD gains are higher at: 10.731 vs. FULT (2.923). FULT has more cash in the bank: 389M vs. CHMG (32.1M). CHMG has less debt than FULT: CHMG (108M) vs FULT (1.77B). FULT has higher revenues than CHMG: FULT (1.29B) vs CHMG (84.7M).
CHMGFULTCHMG / FULT
Capitalization256M3.54B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.7312.923367%
P/E Ratio22.7911.44199%
Revenue84.7M1.29B7%
Total Cash32.1M389M8%
Total Debt108M1.77B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHMG vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
CHMG
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2731
SMR RATING
1..100
5612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
749
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHMG (76). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHMG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (31). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHMG (56). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHMG’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (48). This means that CHMG’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

CHMG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FULT (49). This means that CHMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHMGFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMASF0.220.07
+43.49%
Temas Resources Corp.
KTHN26.410.66
+2.57%
Katahdin Bankshares Corp.
FNCTF16.40N/A
N/A
Orange
SCBGF15.56N/A
N/A
SIG GROUP AG
OSGCF13.66N/A
N/A
Osg Corp. Co. Ltd.

CHMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHMG has been closely correlated with BCAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHMG jumps, then BCAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHMG
1D Price
Change %
CHMG100%
-0.37%
BCAL - CHMG
69%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
WSBF - CHMG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
UMBF - CHMG
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
CBNK - CHMG
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
FULT - CHMG
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.05%
FNB - FULT
93%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
HWC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
ASB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
UCB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
ONB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More