Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$31.39
Change+$1.89 (+6.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.31M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$252.73
Change+$1.43 (+0.57%)
Volume$5.59M
Net Assets23.63B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 23.6B vs. CHPS (7.31M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CHPS: SMH (4.361) vs CHPS (-1.684). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (2 years) vs SMH (13 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS (18.00) and SMH (18.00) have matching turnover.
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -1.684 | 4.361 | -39% |
| Net Assets | 7.31M | 23.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 18.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 1.04 | 0.45 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 88% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| MKSI - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| ASML - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||