Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$34.90
Change-$0.20 (-0.57%)
Volume$370
Net Assets8.21M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$287.80
Change+$1.19 (+0.42%)
Volume$5.9M
Net Assets26.44B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26.4B vs. CHPS (8.21M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CHPS: SMH (18.842) vs CHPS (16.586). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 16.586 | 18.842 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 8.21M | 26.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 15.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 0.38 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 88% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| MKSI - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| ASML - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||