Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$35.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.77%)
Volume$171
Net Assets8.16M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$283.62
Change+$2.37 (+0.84%)
Volume$94.62K
Net Assets25.87B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 25.9B vs. CHPS (8.16M). CHPS has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: CHPS (17.430) vs SMH (16.137). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 17.430 | 16.137 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 8.16M | 25.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 15.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 0.38 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | +1.34% | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 88% Closely correlated | +3.79% | ||
| MKSI - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | +3.86% | ||
| ASML - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||