Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
Price$39.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$319.32
Change-$1.74 (-0.54%)
Volume$2.35K
Net Assets30.49B
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 30.5B vs. CHPS (10.1M). SMH (32.576) and CHPS (32.483) have matching annual dividend yield . CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 32.483 | 32.576 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 10.1M | 30.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 15.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 0.37 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TAGS | 23.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Teucrium Agricultural Fund | |||
| GVUS | 52.19 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF | |||
| FITE | 83.48 | -0.32 | -0.38% |
| SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | |||
| CSQ | 19.15 | -0.12 | -0.62% |
| Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
| IWMI | 48.11 | -0.30 | -0.62% |
| NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | |||
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 90% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 88% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| MKSI - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| ASML - CHPS | 85% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||